Can’t we just think in terms of something in between, a sensible compromise?” “Isn’t the truth somewhere in between where you have two or three air vehicles but a greater resource allocation for systems? In other words, the truth isn’t the F-35 and the truth isn’t the Century Series. Maybe this is going too far in the other direction,” he said.
![force fx trainer force fx trainer](https://assets.reebok.com/images/w_600,f_auto,q_auto/eebe28014afb4c8dabeeac77018643c2_9366/Club_C_Double_Rose_FX3209_52_standard.jpg)
“With the F-35, we had too much systems and not enough air vehicle.
Force fx trainer series#
But a Century Series approach, he warned, could prioritize the development of new air vehicles at the expense of investments in new weapons, radars, sensors, communications gear or other enabling technology.
Force fx trainer software#
(Boeing)īut creating a simple training jet like the T-X is much different than manufacturing a penetrating fighter jet like the NGAD, and there is no proof that those new manufacturing techniques will work for a more advanced aircraft, argued Richard Aboulafia, an aerospace analyst with the Teal Group.Īboulafia suggested the Air Force might be “overreacting” to the struggles of the F-35, where a “one-size-fits-all” approach and a focus on software and sensors produced a very expensive aircraft that took almost two decades to develop.
![force fx trainer force fx trainer](https://www.boker.de/media/image/74/2c/5e/fox-knives-folding-karambit-trainer-01fx007.jpg)
This artist's rendering from Boeing shows one concept for the Air Force's future fighter, known as Next Generation Air Dominance. The Air Force is requiring Northrop Grumman and Boeing to use the technique to develop their respective versions of the Ground Based Strategic Deterrent. “And then if you kept going and you modeled the maintenance, then you could go after the part of the life cycle that constitutes the 70 percent of what we pay."įew defense programs have used digital engineering so far, Roper said. You’re already up to a level of proficiency that in the past you would have to be in the 100th aircraft to have,” he said. “You could start learning so much before you ever bent the first piece of metal and turned the first wrench, so that when you did do it for the first time, you already have learned. The process would allow companies to not only map out an aircraft in extreme detail, but also model how a production line would work using different levels of manning or how maintainers would carry out repairs at a depot. While aerospace engineers have used computers for decades to aid in the creation of aircraft, only recently have defense companies developed 3D-modeling tools that can model an entire life cycle - design, production and sustainment - with a high level of accuracy and fidelity.
![force fx trainer force fx trainer](https://m.media-amazon.com/images/I/719UZTI0NzL._AC_SL1500_.jpg)
The final technology, digital engineering, is the most nascent and possibly the most revolutionary, Roper said.